Pre-engineered industrial go-down — 5,700 sft plinth, 21,355 kg structural steel, delivered on a uniform ISMB400 primary section.
Client name, plot details and project constraints are not yet on record for this page. Placeholder, per standing rule — see FGH-DEF-001 §B.
Client: [CLIENT NAME — PENDING CONSENT]
| Measure | Value |
|---|---|
| Plinth area | 5,700 sft |
| Net area | 5,420 sft |
| Bays | 8 bays at 5.715 m c/c |
| Portal frames | 9 |
| Structural steel | 21,355 kg |
| Steel intensity | 3.94 kg/sft |
Line-item rates, per-item costing and margin are withheld from this page by design.
The primary structural section runs ISMB400 uniform throughout — the haunch eliminated, connections simplified, and bracing and connection allowances reduced accordingly.
Loads per IS 875 Parts 1–3; sections checked to IS 800; footings to IS 456 and IS 1904.
The decision to hold one section uniform rather than vary it bay to bay is a judgement, not a default. A haunched frame can shave material at the knee at the cost of a more complex connection, more fabrication variety, and more that can go wrong at erection. A uniform section trades a small material margin for fewer distinct parts, simpler quality control, and a connection detail repeated identically at every frame rather than re-verified at each one.
That trade is the engineering content of this page, and it is the reason this case study exists at all: not to show that a PEB go-down was built, but to show the basis on which one specific structural decision was made. Publishing the reasoning, not just the outcome, is what distinguishes an engineer-led build from one that simply reports a result.
Timeline, delivery sequence and the specific Inspection and Test Plan hold points applied on this project are not yet on record for this page. The general framework they would follow is described on how we work.
No project photographs, drawings or calculation extracts are published on this page. Client consent for imagery has not been confirmed — see FGH-DEF-001 §A (client consent for case study imagery) and §B for this session's asset manifest.